“When contemplating securities issued in a typical Structured MCP Transaction, we’re of the idea that, topic to the Finance Lease Proviso (see part IV beneath), the CRR Guidelines is not going to apply to such issuances and thus is not going to represent an Trade Act ABS.”
Obtain this white paper as a pdf right here.
The aim of this White Paper is to supply normal steerage to transaction contributors and practitioners of their consideration of the applying of the provisions of Part 15G of the Securities Trade Act of 1934, as amended (the “Trade Act”), as added by part 941 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Road Reform and Client Safety Act (“Dodd-Frank”) and the federal interagency credit score threat retention guidelines promulgated thereunder, codified at 17 C.F.R. Half 246 (the “CRR Guidelines”), to a typical issuance of securities by a newly fashioned particular objective automobile that owns or will personal, amongst different issues, a portfolio of marine containers and associated leases which can be entered into straight or not directly by means of a number of administration agreements (a “Structured MCP Transaction”). This White Paper was ready by Watson Farley & Williams LLP (“WFW”) however doesn’t replicate the view of WFW within the context of any specific transaction. The steerage set forth on this White Paper is for informational functions solely and is topic to alter in gentle of future federal interagency choices deciphering the CRR Guidelines or relevant legislative or judicial motion. Neither this publication nor the regulation agency that authored it are rendering authorized or different skilled recommendation or opinions on particular information or issues, nor does the distribution of this publication to any particular person represent the institution of an attorney-client relationship.
The CRR Guidelines require every securitizer of “asset-backed securities” (as such time period is outlined in Part 3(a)(79) of the Trade Act, an “Trade Act ABS”) to retain an financial curiosity in a portion of the credit score threat for all belongings transferred, bought or in any other case conveyed to a 3rd celebration by such securitizer by way of the issuance of asset-backed securities. The CRR Guidelines got here into impact on December 24, 2016 for all courses of asset-backed securities (apart from these collateralized by residential mortgages, which took impact from December 2015). Because the CRR Guidelines solely apply to Trade Act ABS, the important thing consideration is whether or not a typical Structured MCP Transaction constitutes an issuance of:
“a fixed-income or different safety collateralized by any kind of self-liquidating monetary asset (together with a mortgage, a lease, a mortgage, or a secured or unsecured receivable) that enables the holder of the safety to obtain funds that rely primarily on money movement from the asset,…”.¹ (emphasis added)
However the voluntary compliance with the CRR Guidelines in some prior Structured MCP Transactions, when contemplating securities issued in a typical Structured MCP Transaction, we’re of the idea that, topic to the Finance Lease Proviso (see part IV beneath), the CRR Guidelines is not going to apply to such issuances and thus is not going to represent an Trade Act ABS. Now we have detailed the explanations for this conclusion beneath.
2. Anatomy of a typical Structured MCP Transaction
The sponsor of a Structured MCP Transaction (the “Sponsor”) is often both (a) a container leasing firm whose main enterprise is to personal, lease and handle a portfolio of containers for itself (in addition to handle portfolios of containers owned by different unaffiliated third events (a “Lease Supervisor“) or (b) an entity that companies a portfolio of containers owned by different group associates (a “Servicer”) which are leased to totally different lessees by way of a number of Lease Managers. The related portfolio(s) of containers, alongside any related leases and the related administration agreements with the Lease Managers (the “Lease Administration Agreements”), are then bought by the Sponsor to a newly fashioned particular objective automobile (the “Issuer”). The Issuer itself is often both a completely owned subsidiary of the Sponsor or an orphan particular objective automobile owned fully by a charitable or objective belief.
With a purpose to purchase the portfolio of containers, the Issuer will get hold of finance by issuing a number of courses of debt securities and, in some current circumstances, promoting some or all of its residual (or fairness) pursuits to a third-party purchaser, within the type of unusual shares within the Issuer or a revenue taking part observe (e.g., an E observe). The inclusion of the sale of fairness pursuits (or an E observe) to a third-party signifies that the purchaser will usually, akin to the due diligence a purchaser would carry out in reference to the acquisition of a goal firm, carry out due diligence on the Sponsor, the vendor (if totally different), the Lease Supervisor(s) and their respective related associates, in addition to on the containers that are owned or to be bought by the Issuer and any related Lease Administration Settlement(s) pursuant to which lease proceeds are collected.
The Issuer is mostly managed by a Board of Administrators (the “Board”) which engages third events to handle its enterprise and supply further administrative companies to the Issuer and its Board. The Lease Supervisor(s) sometimes handle the leasing of the containers on behalf of the Issuer pursuant to a number of Lease Administration Agreements and are chargeable for, amongst different issues, amassing lease leases, sale proceeds and complete loss proceeds, imposing the phrases of the lease agreements and remarketing the containers on the market and/or re-lease following the expiry or termination of the lease. In a Servicer-sponsored transaction, the Servicer will enter right into a servicing settlement with the Issuer underneath which the Servicer will monitor the efficiency of the Lease Managers on behalf of the Issuer. The Sponsor can even be required to have interaction a number of alternative Lease Managers upon the resignation or termination of an present Lease Supervisor. The Sponsor can also be chargeable for getting ready (or procuring that the Lease Managers put together) monetary reporting with respect to the container portfolio and also will present different monetary administration and money administration companies. The Board of the Issuer retains rights in respect of sure particular actions, together with the winding up of the Issuer.
As soon as acquired, the containers are used to generate revenue for the Issuer to pay working prices and bills, service its debt securities and make fairness distributions. The revenue stems from (a) hire and associated funds underneath leases of the containers to numerous lessees (that are remitted to the Issuer from the Lease Supervisor(s) pursuant to the Lease Administration Settlement(s)) and (b) the proceeds of the sale or different last disposition of the containers themselves.
Structured MCP Transactions are structured such that the anticipated revenue from the preliminary container leases will likely be insufficient to repay the debt securities and that the estimated current worth of such money flows is comfortably lower than the acquisition value of the portfolio by the Issuer (topic to the Finance Lease Proviso mentioned beneath). With a purpose to generate ample revenue to completely repay the debt securities, every container will should be bought, re-leased a number of occasions over the lifetime of a Structured MCP Transaction or scrapped. Subsequently, it’s important to the efficiency of a Structured MCP Transaction that the Issuer (by way of the related Sponsor, Lease Supervisor, the Issuer’s Board and different service suppliers) remarket off-lease containers on the market or lease as applicable, in addition to handle storage prices, upkeep bills, repositioning prices and transition prices.
3. Definition of Asset-Backed Safety
(a) SEC Steerage
The Securities and Trade Fee (the “SEC”) has not expressly interpreted the definition of Trade Act ABS. It has, nevertheless, in Regulation AB that was codified in 2005², outlined sure ‘key ideas’ that it considers are inherent in any “asset-backed safety” (in such generic kind, an “ABS”); such ideas included “a normal absence of lively pool administration” and an emphasis on “the self-liquidating nature of pool belongings that by their very own phrases convert into money.”³.
Earlier than the implementation of Regulation AB, securities backed by belongings which required constructive motion to generate revenue (for instance, the sale of non-performing belongings and bodily property) had been typically thought to not represent an ABS underneath the then present regimes associated to registration, disclosure and reporting for “asset backed securities”. As a part of the amendments being made to Kind S-3 in 1992, the SEC initially adopted a definition of “asset-backed safety” (the “pre-2005 ABS definition”) masking securities that had been “primarily serviced by the money flows of a discrete pool of receivables or different monetary belongings, both fastened or revolving, that by their phrases convert into money inside a finite time interval plus any rights or different belongings designed to guarantee the servicing or well timed distribution of proceeds to the safety holders”.